The ethics of death




Reflecting on the origins maniheystva, Gumilyov comes from afar - he said that "the most common filosofemy the beginning of our era claimed the bipolar world, differ only in one thing: what is considered good, but that - evil. Naturally a division in the system life, according to which the material substance - good, and Void, a deep, - the evil, and who believe that material catches the soul of their toils, enshroud it hurts, but the soul, or quantum of consciousness, seeking to break the will of the real particles become virtual " . Gumilyov considers both approaches unsubstantiated, but they give rise to two models of human behavior in the world and, accordingly, the two positions in relation to the ethical meaning of death. "The first position: the material world of horror and has no right to exist, because all life awaiting death, which is the destruction. The second position: the world is beautiful, and death, constantly supporting life, just out of the complex, often unportable situations. Death - benefit because it saves from vsemirovogo evil, injustice, resentment, suffering that terrible death. Both the position is consistent and you can select any of the request. In the first position - the desire to replace the discrete system (biocenose) to hard, which, according to the logic of development, make a living being in the stick, tap in the thermal decomposition reaction to molecules, molecules raspadutsya to atoms, from atoms selected foreground appears real particles, which annigiliruya, turn online. The limit of such a development - a vacuum. Conversely, when complication systems where life and death go hand in hand, a diversity that is immediately transmitted to the psychological realm, creating art, poetry, and science. But, of course, for the sorrow and joy will have to pay a legitimate physical deaths. Logic is not here, because the correctness of the thesis is given in experience, and intuitive synthesis. The choice of path is free. That kontroverza. And most curiously, that she had seen of our days before the start of a new era, from existentialism to the gnostic, Buddhist-mahayanistov, manheev - apologists first position. " If the theory of LN Gumilev is true, consider that today in the world beat of life. Yet scientists do not quite correctly assesses attitude towards life and death of Christians. The purpose of Christianity is not a set of positive values, which interprets Gumilyov - "pure joy of the flesh, marriage, joy and love to ROdine..." Christ preached love for very different rOdine - celestial and was a stranger to any of patriotism. In this sense, he was an exemplary cosmopolitan...

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8